Будь ласка, використовуйте цей ідентифікатор, щоб цитувати або посилатися на цей матеріал: http://rps.chtei-knteu.cv.ua:8585/jspui/handle/123456789/696
Повний запис метаданих
Поле DCЗначенняМова
dc.contributor.authorМаксим’юк, Оксана Василівна-
dc.contributor.authorМаксим’юк, Наталія Василівна / Maksymiuk, Nataliya-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-02T14:05:49Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-02T14:05:49Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationhttp://e-apsnim.bsmu.edu.ua/article/view/2411-6181.3.2017.67uk_UK
dc.identifier.issn2411-6181(on-line)-
dc.identifier.otherУДК 811.161.2’367.32:81’42-
dc.identifier.urihttp://rps.chtei-knteu.cv.ua:8585/jspui/handle/123456789/696-
dc.description.abstractThe article is dedicated to the communicative act. The communicative act is defined as concep-tually and structurally organized exchange of communicative acti-vities of speakers with in the verbal contact, in which the basic meaning is a discourse that relies on a certain situation. So the research of refusal communicative acts becomes urgent because they are inelienable components of everyday speech and they oper-ate on the field of noncooperative verbal interaction and also the analysis of semantical, pragmatical and discussional peculiarities. Semantic and pragmatic aspects of research involves the descrip-tion of refusal communicative acts from the viewpoint of the theory of speech genres and the theory of speech acts. Cognitive and communicative-pragmatic aspects are harmoniously combined and focused in the structure of the «linguistic identity» notion. Having analysed precisely the internal structure of the comm-unicative act we can make the conclusions that refusal acts as poly-illocutiv items by its nature show broad functional variability of speaker’s intention. The dominating component of the content or the method of its transfer the illocutive means are combined in acts of assertion and direction of the pragmatic space of interaction. In acts assertion the assertive and expressive strenght (positive sign) become crucial, in acts of direction – directive and expressive (negative sign) become crucial. The choice of refusal illocutive mean is caused by the following factors: the nature of the presen-tation of a stimulus and the intention status of the speaker. They cause the modification of the ultimate goal of the initiator of re-fuse: regulation plan of actions of initiaror of incentive, consolida-tion of relations and maintaining the positive image, oppression of the interests of incentive initiator, rejection of his plan of actions, and the subordination of his intentions of interests to the interests of initiator of refuse.uk_UK
dc.language.isoukuk_UK
dc.publisherАктуальні питання суспільних наук та історії медицини. Спільний українсько-румунський науковий журнал. (АПСНІМ), 2017, № 3 (15), С. 11-15uk_UK
dc.subjectcommunicative refusal actuk_UK
dc.subjectcommunicatorsuk_UK
dc.subjectassertive actsuk_UK
dc.subjectassertive acts, directive actsuk_UK
dc.subjectillocutive strengthuk_UK
dc.subjectintentionuk_UK
dc.titleФункційно-семантичні параметри комунікативного акту відмови в українському художньому дискурсіuk_UK
dc.title.alternativeFunctional and Semantic Parameters of the Refusal Communicative Act in Ukrainian Literary Discourseuk_UK
dc.typeArticleuk_UK
Розташовується у зібраннях:16.21.21.05 Вихідні прийоми наукового аналізу мовного матеріалу

Файли цього матеріалу:
Файл Опис РозмірФормат 
Максимюк Н._БДМУ.pdfосновний текст817.29 kBAdobe PDFПереглянути/відкрити


Усі матеріали в архіві електронних ресурсів захищені авторським правом, всі права збережені.