http://rps.chtei-knteu.cv.ua:8585/jspui/handle/123456789/448 2026-04-04T13:14:52Z 2026-04-04T13:14:52Z Максим’юк, Оксана Василівна Максим’юк, Наталія Василівна / Maksymiuk, Nataliya http://rps.chtei-knteu.cv.ua:8585/jspui/handle/123456789/697 2025-04-27T19:06:09Z 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z

Title: Комунікативні стратегії відмови в українськомовному діалогійному художньому дискурсі Authors: Максим’юк, Оксана Василівна; Максим’юк, Наталія Василівна / Maksymiuk, Nataliya Abstract: The purpose of the article analyzes the problem of choosing tactics and strategies of refusal, which is largely predetermined by the social and gender status of the participants in the communication. Separately, the peculiarities of the functioning of such structures of refusal in the plane of directives are characterized, since the directive acts most fully discover the peculiarities of structuring the communicative acts of refusal utterances taking into account the social role of the participants in communication. The influence of gender aspect on the course of interaction in communicative acts is traced as well. The novelty of scientific reseach. The choice of tactics for refusal are determined by pragmatic factors, as well as by the social and gender status of the participants in the communication, are predetermined by the choice of tactics in communicative acts of the refusal utterances. Most often, refusal producents (persons with lower social status) in the directive act of the order use the following tactics of the strategy of refusal: they refer to the inability to execute the order, requirement or instruction because of the important reasons (with motivation); impersonate an incompetent person; indicate the groundlessness of the order or claim; refuse due to the inability to perform the action at this time; occasionally, refusal is a manifestation of protest. In communicative situations with the downward vector, the most frequent is the tactics of refusal with motivation (to refer to the impossibility of performing because of the important reason (in the opinion of the producer of the refusal)); less often the tactics of impersonating an incompetent person. In the directive acts of the claim with the ascending vector, the stimulus producer's reply contains a compulsory motivation and may be accompanied by expression. Conclusions. Communication tactics that women choose as refusal producent are aimed at harmonizing relationships between communication partners. Formation of refusal discourses of with the emphasis on the disharmony of relationships is peculiar to men.

2021-01-01T00:00:00Z Максим’юк, Оксана Василівна Максим’юк, Наталія Василівна / Maksymiuk, Nataliya http://rps.chtei-knteu.cv.ua:8585/jspui/handle/123456789/696 2025-04-27T18:49:35Z 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z

Title: Функційно-семантичні параметри комунікативного акту відмови в українському художньому дискурсі Authors: Максим’юк, Оксана Василівна; Максим’юк, Наталія Василівна / Maksymiuk, Nataliya Abstract: The article is dedicated to the communicative act. The communicative act is defined as concep-tually and structurally organized exchange of communicative acti-vities of speakers with in the verbal contact, in which the basic meaning is a discourse that relies on a certain situation. So the research of refusal communicative acts becomes urgent because they are inelienable components of everyday speech and they oper-ate on the field of noncooperative verbal interaction and also the analysis of semantical, pragmatical and discussional peculiarities. Semantic and pragmatic aspects of research involves the descrip-tion of refusal communicative acts from the viewpoint of the theory of speech genres and the theory of speech acts. Cognitive and communicative-pragmatic aspects are harmoniously combined and focused in the structure of the «linguistic identity» notion. Having analysed precisely the internal structure of the comm-unicative act we can make the conclusions that refusal acts as poly-illocutiv items by its nature show broad functional variability of speaker’s intention. The dominating component of the content or the method of its transfer the illocutive means are combined in acts of assertion and direction of the pragmatic space of interaction. In acts assertion the assertive and expressive strenght (positive sign) become crucial, in acts of direction – directive and expressive (negative sign) become crucial. The choice of refusal illocutive mean is caused by the following factors: the nature of the presen-tation of a stimulus and the intention status of the speaker. They cause the modification of the ultimate goal of the initiator of re-fuse: regulation plan of actions of initiaror of incentive, consolida-tion of relations and maintaining the positive image, oppression of the interests of incentive initiator, rejection of his plan of actions, and the subordination of his intentions of interests to the interests of initiator of refuse.

2017-01-01T00:00:00Z Максим’юк, Наталія Василівна / Maksymiuk, Nataliya Максим’юк, Оксана Василівна http://rps.chtei-knteu.cv.ua:8585/jspui/handle/123456789/695 2025-04-27T19:11:10Z 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z

Title: Аксіологічний аспект висловлень зі значенням відмови Authors: Максим’юк, Наталія Василівна / Maksymiuk, Nataliya; Максим’юк, Оксана Василівна Abstract: У статті проаналізовано аксіологічний аспект висловлень зі значенням віідмови у контексті мовленнєвої діяльності людини, зазначено вплив оцінного компонента на мовленнєво-мисленнєву діяльність комунікантів, а саме з’ясовано, що у комунікативних актах відмови зіткнення інтенцій (переважно кооперативної в адресанта та некооперативної в адресата) виявляється черезрізну оцінку, а відтак і ставлення комунікантів до навколишньої дійсності, один до одного, до висловлень співрозозмовників. The article analyzes the axiological aspect of the expressions with the meaning of refuse in the context of human speech, the influence of evaluative component on the thinking and spoken activity of the communicants is determined. It’s discovered that the collision of the intentions is made through different assessment in the communicative acts of refuse and it explains the attitude of the communicants to reality, to each other, to the comments of the interlocutors.

2016-01-01T00:00:00Z Максим’юк, Наталія Василівна / Maksymiuk, Nataliya Максим’юк, Оксана Василівна http://rps.chtei-knteu.cv.ua:8585/jspui/handle/123456789/694 2025-04-27T19:01:46Z 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z

Title: До питання про статус висловлень зі значенням відмови в контексті сучасних лінгвістичних студій Authors: Максим’юк, Наталія Василівна / Maksymiuk, Nataliya; Максим’юк, Оксана Василівна Abstract: У статті проаналізовано мовленнєвий акт і мовленнєвий жанр як категорії організації мовлення та визначено місце висловлень зі значенням відмови в класифікації мовленнєвих жанрів, тобто комунікативно-прагматичний та семантичний аналіз уможливив кваліфікацію відмови як мовленнєвого жанру (МЖ) реактивного регістру мовлення, що має (переважно) діалогічну природу, функціонує в умовах безпосереднього мовленнєвого спілкування як первинний МЖ. We have attempted to analyze the speech act and the speech genre as a category of speech organization and determine the place of expressions with the value of the refusal phrases in the classification of speech genres. At the present stage, we see convergence and even integration within the separate directions of these concepts as units of different levels. Increasingly, the view is expressed that the theory of speech acts and the theory of speech genres can and must complement each other; At the same time, using two terms, linguists make some adjustments to the understanding of these categories. We consider that the language genres appear as the social circuits of the speech actions enshrined in the social circulation, adopted in certain situations and intended to convey certain content, – typical methods of speech constructing are characterized by a more complex construction than a speech act (which is actually a speech action carried out in pragmatic coordinates I (addressee / addressee) – You (the addressee / addressee) – here – are now under the influence of a large number of communicative factors and can combine several illocutionary forces. It is difficult to identify the boundaries in the speech between the linguistic act and the linguistic genre, since in the actual communication the latter are presented in the form of fragments, and can be realized by one speech act, or combine fragments of other speech genres. In general, we consider the speech genre as a category of the organization of the linguistic code of the hierarchically higher order, and we believe that each statement at the same time, may be a relevant speech act and a fragment of a certain (not necessarily the same name) speech genre or its specific implementation. Communicative, pragmatic and semantic analysis made it possible to qualify a refusal as a speech genre of the reactive register of speech, which has (predominantly) a dialogic nature, functions in the context of direct speech communication as the primary language genre, which arises as a reaction to replicas of a directive or commissive type, can act as elementary speech genre or complicated by other types of expressions. For our study, dialogical speech (replica-stimulus – replica-reaction) is relevant, in the analysis of which we take into account both the intentions of the speaker and the intention of the addressee.

2017-01-01T00:00:00Z